Vertical agents
An agent for one job in one industry. It knows the forms, the norms and the exceptions, and it stops where a human has to decide.
Dark or light?
A founding team in Germany, 2026
We build custom agents for skilled work in regulated industries. Each one comes with the scenarios, evaluations, traces and guards a reviewer needs before signing off.
Yes, that is a cat on a unicorn. The saddle is the point.
Three things, and they belong together. An agent for one job, an architecture sized to that job, and the harness that makes the agent testable.
An agent for one job in one industry. It knows the forms, the norms and the exceptions, and it stops where a human has to decide.
A single prompt rarely carries a whole workflow. We split the work into an orchestrator, specialist agents, tools and an audit log, and we keep the number of parts as small as the job allows.
The scaffolding around the agent: scenarios from real cases, evaluation runs, traces, guards and replay. It is the part that turns a demo into something a team can rely on.
The point where a human signs is a design decision we make first. Everything in front of it is built so that the signature means something.
A harness turns an agent into something you can test. We write scenarios from real cases, run the agent against them, keep every trace, score the result against a rubric and fix what fails. The gate stays closed until the score holds.
The unicorn is the goal every founding team is told to chase. The cat is the one who checks whether the saddle holds before the ride.
We named the company after the sparkle ("funkeln" in German) and gave the cat the job of checking the harness. In practice that means the fun part, an agent that drafts a permit in minutes, comes after the boring part, the scenarios it has to pass first.
The logo is an AI-generated draft. The cat is staying.
The method stays the same, the field is still open. Six fields on the table. None is decided. We score them this autumn and take one or two into customer interviews.
Agents that test and defend AI systems, and the compliance work that EU product rules create for makers of connected devices and software.
exploringAI literacy for companies, and for people who have never used an assistant. Training first, a product later if the demand is there.
exploringAssistants for carers, and products against loneliness for older people. Who pays is the open question.
exploringAgents that buy on behalf of people, and shops that are ready to be found and read by agents.
exploringCards, maps and small apps generated for one person or one occasion, and thrown away after use.
exploringAgents for planning, permits and public services, where staff are short, the work follows forms, and a human signs at the end. This is where we expect the harness to matter most.
first interviewsEach founder scores each field on six criteria, alone and before the meeting. Weighted scores decide which one or two go into interviews. The weights are a proposal until the team has changed them once.
Five founders. Profiles follow once each of us has written one, which is slower than building a website.
Between us: software architecture, AI enablement in large organisations, product work, and contacts in energy, utilities and local government. Roles for the evaluation phase: idea owner, market research, customer access, prototyping, and process.
If you run a team where the work follows rules and forms and someone has to sign at the end, we would like to hear what slows you down. Thirty minutes, no slides.
hello@funkeltronic.ai